 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
January 20, 2012
To receive email notice of future Briscoe Ivester & Bazel
newsletters as they are published, please click here and we will advise
you as new editions are posted. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
On December 9, 2011, the two federal agencies responsible for the Endangered Species Act (ESA) announced a draft policy providing a new interpretation of a key phrase in the ESA's definition of "endangered species."
Read More >> |
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
On October 8, 2011, Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 436 authorizing state and local agencies to transfer funds to a nonprofit organization, special district or land trust that are set aside for long-term management of land acquired as mitigation for a development project.
Read More >> |
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Protection Agency propose to expand their regulatory jurisdiction by reinterpreting two U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Read More >> |
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
The Chagos Archipelago, which dots the heart of the Indian Ocean, is in the middle of a very 21st century international dispute.
Read More >> |
| |
|
| |
 |
|
While California’s newly elected Governor Brown aims to cut the state budget and, toward that end, proposes rolling back some environmental programs, such as preservation of agricultural and open space preserves under the Williamson Act, the State Water Resources Control Board appears headed in the opposite direction.
Read More >> |
| |
|
| |
 |
|
Is there an environmental impact report in your future? If you are among those planning a development project within the geographic boundaries of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) or even beyond, odds that the answer is “yes” just increased.
Read More >> |
| |
|
| |
 |
|
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently resolved two issues fundamental to officially designating "critical habitat" for species protected under the federal Endangered Species Act.
Read More >> |
| |
|
| |
 |
|
A new California law requires water rights holders around the state to begin reporting pre-1914 and riparian water diversions to the State Water Resources Control Board ("Water Board") by July 1, 2010 or face penalties of $1,000 and up to $500 per day. Previously, riparian and pre-1914 water rights holders could abstain from reporting without consequence, and diverters in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta ("Delta") were exempt from reporting their diversions.
Read More >> |
| |
|
|
|
| |

|